For sellers

Can a call center sell its recorded calls to AI? Who owns them and who agreed

A call center or BPO holds thousands of recorded calls, but selling or licensing them depends on three questions: whose calls they are, who agreed to be recorded and what the voices and card numbers reveal.

Written by Jimmy LinFounder of AI Training Data Broker

, 4 min read


A call center sits on years of recorded conversations: a customer with a problem, an agent who solves it, a quality score and an outcome. Speech and agent models learn from exactly that. So the question is fair: can the center sell or license those calls?

Often yes in principle, and often not as they stand. Three questions decide it, in this order.

1. Whose calls are they?

If the center serves its own customers, the recordings are usually its own. If it is an outsourcer (a BPO) handling calls for clients, the contract usually decides, and the usual answer is that the client owns the recordings or controls how they are used. Selling client calls without the client's agreement is the fastest way to end a client relationship and start a dispute.

So the first step is dull and necessary: list your clients, find the clause about recordings and data in each contract and sort the calls into three groups. Yours, a client's, and unclear. Only the first group is ready to discuss. The second group may be licensed with the client's written agreement, and some clients will want a share of the proceeds. We help with that conversation. The third group waits.

2. Who agreed to be recorded?

The rules on recording differ by place, and they differ in a way that matters here.

In the United States, the federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. section 2511) allows a person who is a party to a call to record it, or to record it where one party has consented, unless the purpose is criminal or harmful. Many states follow that one-party approach. Some require every party to agree. California Penal Code section 632 is a well-known example: recording a confidential communication without the consent of all parties is an offense, though a setting where recording can reasonably be expected is treated differently. Dates and details of laws change, so read the current text of the statute for each place your callers live.

The notice "this call may be recorded for quality and training purposes" matters, but it was written for quality and training. Whether it also covers a license to an AI lab is a question for your counsel, and the honest answer may differ by state and by when the call was made. Recent calls with a clearer notice are easier to discuss than old ones.

Other countries have their own rules, and callers abroad bring those rules with them. We check them region by region before a sample leaves the company.

3. What does the recording reveal?

A voice can identify a person. Illinois lists a voiceprint among the biometric identifiers its Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/10) protects. Under the GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Article 9), biometric data used to identify a person is a special category that is prohibited by default unless a specific ground applies. The European Data Protection Board's guidelines on virtual voice assistants, adopted in July 2021, treat voiceprints as sensitive. A practical consequence: a transcript with the voice taken out is often where a conversation begins, and audio comes later, if at all.

Then there is what callers say aloud: names, addresses, account numbers, health details and card numbers. The PCI Security Standards Council states in its FAQ on call recordings, under PCI DSS 4.0 requirement 3.3.1, that card verification codes cannot be stored after authorization, including in audio files. If your agents take payments by voice, those parts of the call have to be prevented from being recorded or removed from the recording. Calls with health details also raise the HIPAA question. Our de-identification page describes how names, numbers and voices are handled and recorded.

What a lab wants to see

A lab does not need every call. It wants a clear description and a sample it can open: how many calls, which languages, how long they average, whether each has a transcript, a quality score and an outcome, and the years they cover. A sample of three to five complete calls, cleaned and checked, tells more than a page of description. Our post on what to have ready before you talk to a data broker gives the full list.

The calls with a recorded outcome are the more useful ones, because an agent model can be graded against what really happened. Our post on documented processes and task runs explains why.

What we do

We start with the contract review above, then plan the removal of personal details and voices, then prepare the sample. You keep the final decision on every term. Most deals are licenses, not sales of the company, so you keep the recordings and the right to your business.

More detail is on the page for call centers and BPOs, the data-type page on consented recordings and the slides for this question. The data value calculator takes about a minute. If you have a set of calls and want a straight answer, tell us what you hold.

Sources

Questions people ask

Can we license calls recorded years ago?

Sometimes. The notice given at the time, the place of the caller and the contract with the client all matter, so older calls are sorted before any sample is prepared.

Do we need to sell audio, or is text enough?

Text is the usual starting point. Audio carries voices, which raise the biometric questions, and it is discussed only after the rights are checked.

Do our agents have to agree?

Check your employment terms and local rules. Agents' voices are also on the recordings, so their position is part of the review.

What if the client owns the calls?

Then the client decides, and we can approach the client with you. The client may also want a share of any license.

Didn't find your question? Ask us directly.


See if your company is a fit

More articles